Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712742›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Trauma Care and Emergency Preparedness Training Programs on Prehospital Primary Survey Skills: A Systematic Review.

Abdullah Sajid, Areej Shakir, Manahil Awan, Fnu Warsha, Shahzad Ahmad, Lara Alsadoun, Muhammad Qaiser Aziz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ten years of clinical negligence claims in otolaryngology: trends, costs, and preventable harm in the UK national health service.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdullah SajidCardiology, Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology, Bahawalpur, PAK.
Areej ShakirIntensive Care, Fatimiyah Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Manahil AwanGeneral Medicine, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Fnu WarshaInternal Medicine, Norton Community Hospital, Norton, USA.
Shahzad AhmadCardiac Surgery, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Lara AlsadounTrauma and Orthopedics, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, GBR.
Muhammad Qaiser AzizCardiac Surgery, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review evaluates the impact of trauma care and emergency preparedness training programs on prehospital primary survey effectiveness. A comprehensive search strategy was employed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and the Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), focusing on studies involving healthcare professionals such as paramedics, nurses, and emergency medical technicians (EMTs). The review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), clinical trials, and cohort studies that assessed various training modalities like virtual reality (VR) simulations, case-based learning (CBL), and hands-on workshops. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool for randomized trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for clinical trials, ensuring methodological rigor and consistency. The findings suggest that CBL significantly improves knowledge retention and prehospital primary survey skills, outperforming other methods such as simulation exercises, which showed mixed results. VR training increased confidence levels but did not demonstrate significant improvements in objective skills compared to traditional methods. The use of supplementary triage assistance teams (physician-nurse supplementary triage team (MDRNSTAT)) was found to be effective during high patient volume hours, though not cost-effective as a daytime strategy. While the review highlights the importance of interactive and scenario-based training programs, limitations such as variability in study designs, publication bias, and language bias were noted, suggesting that caution should be exercised in generalizing the results. Future research should focus on long-term effectiveness, the integration of emerging technologies, and larger, well-designed trials across diverse healthcare settings to strengthen the evidence base.

Indexed as

emergancyprehospital trainingprimary surveyskill trainingtrauma care

Identifiers

PMID39712742
PMCPMC11661892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.