Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712731›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Scoping Review of Virtual Reality (VR)-Based Disaster Mitigation Education.

Ryohei Kimura, Ayako Fukushima, Kohei Kajiwara, Hideaki Sakuramoto, Shun Yoshihara, Kimie Harada, Teruyuki Nakayama, Akiko Ito

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ryohei KimuraFaculty of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, JPN.
Ayako FukushimaFaculty of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, JPN.
Kohei KajiwaraFaculty of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, JPN.
Hideaki SakuramotoFaculty of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, JPN.
Shun YoshiharaFaculty of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, JPN.
Kimie HaradaFaculty of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, JPN.
Teruyuki NakayamaFaculty of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, JPN.
Akiko ItoFaculty of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Toyota College of Nursing, Toyota, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explored the use of virtual reality (VR) in disaster preparedness education, focusing on VR scenarios, disaster types, and user interactivity to identify gaps in existing research. A scoping review methodology, based on the Arksey and O'Malley framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, was used, and the protocols were registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000052800). The review included PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web of the Japan Medical Abstract Society, with data up to January 31, 2024. Studies on disaster preparedness and mitigation education using VR were included, without restrictions on study design, country, or language. We excluded studies utilizing non-immersive VR, as well as non-academic letters to the editor, editorials, commentaries, review articles, conference abstracts, and non-academic manuscripts. In the first screening phase, 2 researchers independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of 516 articles and conducted the screening. A total of 17 articles were selected. In cases where there were differing opinions on inclusion or exclusion, the two researchers discussed the matter together. In the second screening phase, the 17 selected articles underwent full-text screening. Three articles were excluded because their outcomes did not align with our research. Eight articles were excluded based on our predefined criteria, which included commentaries, editorials, and review articles. Ultimately, six articles were included in the meta-analysis. Of these, three studies were from East Asia, one from Australia, one from North America, and one from an unspecified region. Disaster types included chemical, radiation, explosion, fire, and earthquake events. The VR training scenarios covered evacuation, first aid, patient transport, triage, decontamination, and other skills. Five of the studies emphasized user interactivity and were primarily aimed at professionals such as medical staff and nursing students. Current VR disaster response training primarily targets professionals, demonstrating its effectiveness and importance; however, there is a lack of studies focusing on training for the general public, especially in the least developed countries. Extending VR-based training programs to the general public is critical to improving countries' disaster response capabilities.

Indexed as

disastereducationlearningmass casualty incidentsvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39712731
PMCPMC11659903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.