ArticleCureus2024
Scoping Review of Virtual Reality (VR)-Based Disaster Mitigation Education.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of virtual reality disaster education on the performance of nursing students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explored the use of virtual reality (VR) in disaster preparedness education, focusing on VR scenarios, disaster types, and user interactivity to identify gaps in existing research. A scoping review methodology, based on the Arksey and O'Malley framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, was used, and the protocols were registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000052800). The review included PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web of the Japan Medical Abstract Society, with data up to January 31, 2024. Studies on disaster preparedness and mitigation education using VR were included, without restrictions on study design, country, or language. We excluded studies utilizing non-immersive VR, as well as non-academic letters to the editor, editorials, commentaries, review articles, conference abstracts, and non-academic manuscripts. In the first screening phase, 2 researchers independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of 516 articles and conducted the screening. A total of 17 articles were selected. In cases where there were differing opinions on inclusion or exclusion, the two researchers discussed the matter together. In the second screening phase, the 17 selected articles underwent full-text screening. Three articles were excluded because their outcomes did not align with our research. Eight articles were excluded based on our predefined criteria, which included commentaries, editorials, and review articles. Ultimately, six articles were included in the meta-analysis. Of these, three studies were from East Asia, one from Australia, one from North America, and one from an unspecified region. Disaster types included chemical, radiation, explosion, fire, and earthquake events. The VR training scenarios covered evacuation, first aid, patient transport, triage, decontamination, and other skills. Five of the studies emphasized user interactivity and were primarily aimed at professionals such as medical staff and nursing students. Current VR disaster response training primarily targets professionals, demonstrating its effectiveness and importance; however, there is a lack of studies focusing on training for the general public, especially in the least developed countries. Extending VR-based training programs to the general public is critical to improving countries' disaster response capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.