ArticleCureus2024
A Quality Improvement Project on Team-Based Care for Depression Screening Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Specialty Clinic.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression screening is an important first step to identifying patients who might benefit from depression treatment. Merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS) quality measures can yield financial benefits or losses for healthcare systems, including depression screening.
objectivesThis study aims to (1) develop a team-based care workflow to improve MIPS depression screening in a specialty clinic and (2) modify the workflow to include a virtual nursing and behavioral health resource after the COVID-19 pandemic hit.
methodsA quality improvement project, utilizing Lean Six Sigma process improvement methods, was implemented to improve team-based depression screening in a specialty clinic. A multidisciplinary team implemented plan-do-study-act cycles, created educational materials tailored to each role, developed electronic medical record (EMR) tools to alert and assist team members in screening, and ensured the EMR aligned with the MIPS criteria. The percentage of eligible visits where depression screening was performed was analyzed across four study periods: pre-intervention, post-intervention, COVID-19, and recovery. Recovery strategies included developing telehealth workflows, establishing centralized registered nurse triage groups, and using phone-based triage and support resources at virtual visits.
resultsUtilizing team-based strategy and available or newly developed tools, the percentage of eligible visits with completed depression screening was as follows: 1.4% pre-intervention, 58.2% post-intervention, 3.5% COVID-19, and 64.0% recovery. With the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, initially, improved screening performance declined sharply. Recovery was achieved through the revision of workflows, team members, and support tools.
conclusionsA team-based care approach can successfully improve and maintain depression screening in a specialty clinic and was versatile enough to be readapted to virtual visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to impacting MIPS quality incentives, the depression screening workflows described in this article can be adapted to other uses, including virtual and in-person visits and in other specialty or chronic disease settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.