ReviewCureus2024
Effectiveness of Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Drugs on Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insurance disparities in hidradenitis suppurativa: A comprehensive review of demographics, outcomes, and access to care.Dermatology online journal · 2026Review
- Determinants of surgical approach to pediatric appendicitis in Brazil.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a painful and chronic inflammatory skin disease with no consistently effective treatment, affecting a significant portion of the Western population. HS is characterized by painful nodules, abscesses, tunnels, and scarring in body folds. The immunobiology is poorly understood, therefore resulting in a lack of effective therapies. Despite indications of microbial involvement, antimicrobial treatments have shown inconsistent and temporary results. Recent studies have identified dysregulated immune responses as a key factor in HS. This has led to the use of biologic agents, most notably adalimumab, which is currently the only FDA-approved therapy for HS. Due to the limited understanding of immune dysregulation in HS, ongoing clinical trials are adapting treatments from other skin conditions, such as psoriasis. As a result, researchers look to other skin conditions with better-understood pathophysiologies, such as psoriasis, as a starting point for developing treatments for HS. While adaptation can offer some benefits, such as immediate treatment options, the lack of specificity can lead to side effects that are not well tolerated, and long-term efficacy may be uncertain. Therefore, there is a pressing need for a foundational understanding of HS's immune dysregulation. Current ongoing research is exploring other options, such as therapies targeting IL-17, in addition to anti-TNF therapies, which have shown the potential to be more effective. With new options emerging, it is essential to evaluate the current performance of anti-TNF drugs in treating HS. This review was conducted to thoroughly assess the effectiveness of these therapies, offering a detailed analysis to inform future research and clinical practice. The objective is to determine whether anti-TNF drugs continue to be a strong treatment option or if newer therapies might lead to better outcomes for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.