Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712686›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Radiation Protection in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Regional Survey.

Dhiraj Sharma, Kate Spacey, Ignatius Liew, Mike Dunne, Vivek Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dhiraj SharmaDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, GBR.
Kate SpaceyDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, GBR.
Ignatius LiewDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, GBR.
Mike DunneDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, West Norfolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds, GBR.
Vivek SharmaDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Orthopaedic surgery frequently involves the use of intra-operative radiographs, commonly taken with surgeons standing in close proximity to the X-ray machine. Radiation training and appropriate radiation protection minimise the harm that surgeons can face from ionising radiation. This study evaluates the current state of radiation training and protective equipment available to orthopaedic surgeons in the East of England. Methods A digital questionnaire on Google Forms (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) was disseminated to regional orthopaedic surgeons between October 2022 and January 2023. Results Of the 75 respondents, 49% were consultants and 51% were trainees at various stages. Regarding training and risk assessment, 62% of surgeons lacked radiation protection training, 45% of female trainees didn't undergo radiation risk assessments during pregnancy, and none did while breastfeeding. Concerning radiation protection, all respondents inadvertently X-rayed their hands; lead gloves and glasses were scarce, and X-ray gowns were in poor condition and in a limited range of sizes. Most surgeons were unwilling to purchase their own dosimeters, lead gowns, thyroid guards, and lead glasses, despite their limited availability, inadequate size range, and poor condition. No significant differences were observed between consultant and registrar responses. Conclusion The study reveals inadequate training and mitigation against radiation exposure in orthopaedics. The lack of radiation training prompted its inclusion in this year's trainee inductions. The shortage of proper radiation protective equipment exposes surgeons to radiation risks. Orthopaedic surgeons should not have to choose between workplace health and safety and affordability. Greater financial support and investment in radiation protection should be prioritised to minimise radiation-induced harm. We aim to raise awareness and encourage key decision-makers to address this critical issue.

Indexed as

ionising radiation exposureoccupational health hazardsorthopaedic surgeryradiation protectionradiation training

Identifiers

PMID39712686
PMCPMC11662163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.