Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712647›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2025

Distribution of spine classes shows intra-neuronal dendritic heterogeneity in mouse cortex.

Carina C Theobald, Ahmadali Lotfinia, Jan A Knobloch, Yasser Medlej, David R Stevens, Marcel A Lauterbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carina C TheobaldSaarland University, Molecular Imaging, Center for Integrative Physiology and Molecular Medicine, Homburg, Germany.
Ahmadali LotfiniaSaarland University, Molecular Imaging, Center for Integrative Physiology and Molecular Medicine, Homburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8411-5531
Jan A KnoblochSaarland University, Molecular Imaging, Center for Integrative Physiology and Molecular Medicine, Homburg, Germany.
Yasser MedlejSaarland University, Molecular Imaging, Center for Integrative Physiology and Molecular Medicine, Homburg, Germany.
David R StevensSaarland University, Molecular Imaging, Center for Integrative Physiology and Molecular Medicine, Homburg, Germany.
Marcel A LauterbachSaarland University, Molecular Imaging, Center for Integrative Physiology and Molecular Medicine, Homburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8145-6873

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Neuronal dendritic spines are central elements for memory and learning. Their morphology correlates with synaptic strength and is a proxy for function. Classic light microscopy cannot resolve spine morphology well, and techniques with higher resolution (electron microscopy and super-resolution light microscopy) typically do not provide spine data in large fields of view, e.g., along entire dendrites. Therefore, it remains unclear if spine types are organized on mesoscopic scales, despite their undisputed importance for understanding the brain. Aim: Recently, it was shown that the distribution of spine type is dendrite-specific in the turtle cortex, suggesting a mesoscopic organization, but leaving the question open if such a dendrite specificity also exists in mammals. Here, we determine if such a difference in spine-type distribution among dendrites also exists in the mouse brain. Approach: We used super-resolution stimulated emission depletion microscopy of complete dendrites and advanced morphological analysis in three dimensions to decipher morphological differences of spines on different dendrites. Results: We found that spines of different shapes decorate different dendrites of the same neuron to a varying extent. Significant differences among the dendrites are apparent, based on spine classes as well as based on quantitative descriptors, such as spine length or head size. Conclusions: Our findings may indicate that it is an evolutionarily conserved principle that individual dendrites have distinct distributions of spine types hinting at individual roles.

Indexed as

dendrite-specificdendritic spinespine morphologyspine shapesuper-resolution stimulated emission depletion microscopythree-dimensional analysis

Identifiers

PMID39712647
PMCPMC11657875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.