ArticleHealth care transitions2024
An institution-wide mixed methods assessment of healthcare transition.
Article in Health care transitions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using electronic health record phenotyping to guide extraction of markers of transition to adulthood in young adults with severe chronic illness: A proposed conceptual framework.Nursing outlook · 2026Article
- Evaluating transitional care practices for adolescents with chronic conditions in two Dutch university hospitals: A mixed-methods study.Health care transitions · 2026Article
- Processes and Predictors in the Transition From Pediatric to Adult Epilepsy Care: A Retrospective Study at a Single Institution.Pediatric neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Healthcare transition (HCT) is the process of moving a patient from pediatric, parent-supervised care to an independent, adult-centered model. This study assesses current HCT activities and explores the educational and system-based needs for effective HCT processes in a single institution. Methods: We interviewed division/care program leaders at one academic tertiary-care children's hospital regarding HCT practices. We evaluated these groups using an interview guide and rubric scoring from the "GotTransition Current Assessment of HCT Activities" (scoring range from 8 [low HCT] to 32 [high HCT]). We audio-recorded and transcribed interviews. We calculated each group's score on the rubric. Two coders qualitatively analyzed interview transcripts using a thematic analysis approach with deductive and inductive strategies. Results: We interviewed 28 participants, each representing one division/care program. The institutional mean on the HCT assessment was 15.5 ± 4.5 (median 17.5, range 8-28). Key interview themes included: 1) Significant heterogeneity in the HCT process exists within most divisions/care programs; 2) While some groups have their own HCT practices, there is no coordinated institutional HCT approach.; 3) Participants find HCT difficult if they perceive the lack of an equivalent adult specialist for a patient's specific medical condition; 4) There is a lack of coordinated handoffs from pediatric to adult providers. 5) Participants desire ancillary staff to support HCT. Conclusion: Despite known benefits of a structured approach, most leaders report heterogeneity in current HCT practices and a lack of institutional resources and adult provider partners to support optimal HCT. We present a reproducible methodology to evaluate HCT within a single institution, as well as baseline assessment data that may inform interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.