ArticleWorld journal of methodology2024
Optimizing outcomes: Implementing enhanced recovery after surgery in orthopedic surgery.
Article in World journal of methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of modified ERAS protocol implementation on length of stay and complications in elderly hip fracture patients: a before-and-after study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Day-Care Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty in Urban India: Patient Education, Apprehensions, and Outcomes.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- A Retrospective Cohort Study on The Impact of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery with Safe Brain Initiative on Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes in Türkiye.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2026Article
- The Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupuncture Stimulation on Postoperative Pain Control and Mobility in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Study Protocol for a Prospective Randomized Trial.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the realm of orthopedics, the adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols marks a significant stride towards enhancing patient well-being. By embracing a holistic approach that encompasses preoperative counseling, dietary optimization, minimally invasive procedures, and early postoperative mobilization, these protocols have ushered in a new era of surgical care. Despite encountering hurdles like resistance to change and resource allocation challenges, the efficacy of ERAS protocols in improving clinical outcomes is undeniable. Noteworthy benefits include shortened hospital stays and bolstered improved patient-safety measures. Looking ahead, the horizon for ERAS in orthopedics appears bright, with an emphasis on tailoring care to individual needs, integrating cutting-edge technologies, and perpetuating research endeavors. This shift towards a more personalized, streamlined, and cost-efficient model of care underscores the transformative potential of ERAS in reshaping not only orthopedic surgery but also the journey to patient recovery. This editorial details the scope and future of ERAS in the orthopedic specialty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.