ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
Animal-Assisted Therapy in palliative care: a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A mixed-methods feasibility study of dog-assisted exercise therapy in geriatric inpatients.BMC geriatrics · 2026Trial
- Therapy Dog Presence During Chemotherapy in a Day Chemotherapy Unit: A Prospective Pilot Comparative Pre-Post Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Palliative treatment and social support needs in patients with liver, gallbladder, and pancreatic tumors.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Animal-assisted therapy (AAT) is increasingly recognized as beneficial in palliative care, aiming to enhance the well-being of terminally ill patients. Palliative care focuses on holistic support for physical, emotional, social, and spiritual needs. AAT uses animal interactions to alleviate symptoms such as pain, anxiety, and depression, promoting social engagement and emotional comfort. This review assesses AAT's effectiveness in enhancing the quality of life for palliative care recipients. Aim: Synthesizing literature on AAT in palliative care, the review examines its impact on physical symptoms, emotional well-being, social interactions, and overall comfort. By analyzing diverse studies, it aims to elucidate AAT's therapeutic potential and identify research gaps. Design: Scoping review. Data sources: Searches in PubMed, ProQuest, Psychology Database, and Scopus identified relevant studies evaluating AAT interventions in palliative care. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, participant demographics, AAT interventions, and reported outcomes. Results: Studies consistently report positive outcomes of AAT in palliative care, including reduced pain, anxiety, depression, and improved mood and well-being. AAT also enhances social interactions and emotional support, albeit with variations in study designs. Conclusion: AAT holds promise for improving quality of life in palliative care by addressing physical, emotional, and social needs. Future research should standardize methodologies, explore mechanisms of action, and optimize AAT integration into comprehensive palliative care strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.