Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712468›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024

Frugal innovation in the business environment: a literature review and future perspectives.

Carlos Escudero-Cipriani, Julio García-Del Junco, Raquel Chafloque-Céspedes, Aldo Alvarez-Risco

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlos Escudero-CiprianiDoctoral Program in Strategic Management and International Business, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Julio García-Del JuncoDepartment of Business Administration and Marketing, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Raquel Chafloque-CéspedesEscuela de Posgrado, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru.
Aldo Alvarez-RiscoFacultad de Administración y Negocios, Universidad Tecnológica del Perú, Lima, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This research aims to explore the growing field of frugal innovation within the business environment, particularly its intersection with sustainability and artificial intelligence. Methods: Through a comprehensive literature review, the study analyzes key research trends and methodologies from 420 scholarly articles published between 2012 and August 2024. A bibliometric review traces the evolution of frugal innovation, while a content analysis provides insights into its practical applications across various industries, especially in resource-constrained settings. Results: The findings highlight the significant role of frugal innovation in addressing global challenges, such as reducing environmental impact and promoting social inclusion, especially through the adoption of cleaner technologies and socially responsible business practices. The study also emphasizes the transformative potential of AI in enhancing the scalability and efficiency of frugal solutions. Discussion: This research contributes to the ongoing conversation on sustainable development by identifying knowledge gaps and proposing future strategies for leveraging frugal innovation to drive inclusive growth. The implications of this research are valuable for academics, practitioners, and policymakers aiming to foster sustainable innovation in diverse socio-economic contexts.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebusiness environmentfrugal innovationmanagement practicesproduct developmentsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39712468
PMCPMC11662995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.