ArticleInternational journal of developmental disabilities2024
Validating the repetitive behavior scale-revised for children in China aged 9 to 16 with autism spectrum disorder.
Article in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Chinese Behavioral Inflexibility Scale: Clinical Interview Version for Children Aged 3-8 Years With Autism Spectrum Disorder in Mainland China.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Core Deficits and Eating Behaviors in Children with Autism: The Role of Executive Function.Nutrients · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Restricted and repetitive behavior (RRB) is one of the two core diagnostic features used to determine the severity of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The Repetitive Behavior Scale‑Revised (RBS-R) is widely used to measure the presence and severity of a variety of RRBs in individuals with ASD. Previous studies have implemented a factor analysis framework to examine the RBS-R, while there're still inconsistencies in the use of the measure. This study analyzed the validity and reliability of the RBS-R using data from 315 Chinese children aged 9-16 with ASD. The results showed that the original tested items were adaptable to the Chinese cultural environment when treating such disorders. A confirmatory factor analysis indicated that a 6-factor model was most suitable for evaluating RRB in this context. Consistent with previous studies, the 6-factor model was preferred because of its fit statistics in evaluating RRBs using data from Chinese children with ASD aged 9-16. It's necessary to implement the same structure (e.g. 6-factor model) of the RBS-R to enable efficient comparisons of results across studies. Validating the RBS-R cross different contexts and using longitudinal data are helpful to advance our knowledge of RRB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.