Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712440›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of developmental disabilities2024

Support needs of families with a child with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.

Siméon T A Lahaije, Jorien Luijkx, Aly Waninge, Annette A J van der Putten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Siméon T A LahaijeFaculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Inclusive and Special Needs Education, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7524-2253
Jorien LuijkxFaculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Inclusive and Special Needs Education, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2348-4637
Aly WaningeFaculty of Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2316-2577
Annette A J van der PuttenFaculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Inclusive and Special Needs Education, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4226-8147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Families with a child with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) have to manage the child's pervasive support needs. To ensure that families are able to manage these needs, they should be properly supported. However, knowledge about the specific support needs of these families is sparse and fragmented, nor is it known if and which needs are age-specific. To learn more about these families' support needs, 20 parents of a child with PIMD aged 3-26 years were interviewed about their family's support needs through interviews with open-ended questions. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analysed to identify support needs in five domains (child with PIMD, family, environment, services, and system). Various (age-specific) support needs were identified. The findings of this study can help health professionals and policy makers to improve the support of families with a child with PIMD by attuning the support to these families' specific needs.

Indexed as

family lifefamily supportprofound intellectual and multiple disabilitiessupport needswell-being

Identifiers

PMID39712440
PMCPMC11660363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.