Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712423›Full record

ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2025

Hemorrhage risk score and peripartum quantified blood loss.

Rubinnis Gutierrez-Disla, Rachana Gheewala, Joshua Fogel, Allan J Jacobs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Assessing risk factors for peripartum quantified blood loss.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rubinnis Gutierrez-DislaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYC/H+H - South Brooklyn Health, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Rachana GheewalaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYC/H+H - South Brooklyn Health, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Joshua FogelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYC/H+H - South Brooklyn Health, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Allan J JacobsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYC/H+H - South Brooklyn Health, Brooklyn, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4619-6147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Risk assessment tools are used by clinicians to predict which patients might have excessive bleeding. We studied the association between a peripartum hemorrhage risk assessment score using peripartum quantified blood loss (QBL) among those with vaginal deliveries who are often at lower risk for peripartum hemorrhage. Methods: In this retrospective analysis of 1221 patients with term vaginal deliveries at a public New York City hospital, the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWOHNN) risk assessment tool was used to categorize patients as low risk, medium risk, or high risk for postpartum hemorrhage. Results: Low-risk scores were present in 925 (75.8%) patients, medium-risk scores in 268 (21.9%) patients, and high-risk scores in 28 (2.3%) patients. Outcome variables consisted of QBL (M = 213.8, SD = 215.00 mL), QBL ≥ 500 mL (n = 89, 7.3%), and ratio of postdelivery hematocrit to predelivery hematocrit (M = 0.9, SD = 0.08). High-risk score (B = 0.14, SE = 0.07, Conclusion: We recommend revising the AWOHNN measure to better reflect medium risk and to consider a different approach for BMI use as part of the AWOHNN risk score.

Indexed as

Obstetric deliveryobstetric labor complicationspostpartum hemorrhagerisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID39712423
PMCPMC11657149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.