ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2025
Exploring social determinants and hepatocellular carcinoma: a scoping review of evidence and implications.
Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Helping patients with cancer address their social needs.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025Article
- Geographic diversity of human liver cancers mirrors global social inequalities.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Social determinants of health (SDH) significantly impact HCC outcomes, yet comprehensive insights into these effects are lacking. This scoping review aimed to examine the influence of SDH on HCC outcomes. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched 10 databases, including PubMed and Scopus, using terms related to HCC and SDH. We included studies published between 1994 and 2024, focusing on human participants and various study designs. A total of 20 studies were selected, including cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies. Results: The review identified disparities in HCC outcomes linked to socioeconomic status, health care access, and racial and ethnic differences. Patients in disadvantaged socioeconomic conditions and marginalized racial groups faced delays in treatment and worse outcomes. United States-based studies highlighted pronounced disparities compared to studies in Argentina, France, and Australia. Various SDH metrics provided inconsistent results, illustrating a need for standardized measures. Conclusions: SDH significantly shapes HCC outcomes, revealing gaps in current research. Future studies should integrate various SDH factors using consistent metrics to improve HCC care and reduce health disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.