Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712383›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

Randomized Controlled Trial: Acquisition of Basic Microsurgical Skills Through Smartphone Training Model.

Maxime De Fré, Andreas Verstreken, Nicolas Vermeersch, Gino Vissers, Veronique Verhoeven, Süleyman Sener, Frederik Verstreken, Tomas Menovsky, Thierry Tondu, Filip E F Thiessen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maxime De FréFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Andreas VerstrekenDepartment of Orthopedics, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Nicolas VermeerschFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Gino VissersFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Veronique VerhoevenDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (ELIZA), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Süleyman SenerDepartment of Neurosurgery, GZA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium.
Frederik VerstrekenDepartment of Orthopedics, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Tomas MenovskyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Thierry TonduFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Filip E F ThiessenFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Microsurgery is essential in various surgical specialties, but learning these skills is challenging due to work hour limitations, patient safety concerns, documentation time, and ethical objections to practicing on live animals. This randomized controlled trial compares 2 microsurgical training models: the smartphone model and the microscope model. Methods: Thirty students without prior microsurgery experience were randomized into 3 groups: control (CG), smartphone (SG), and microscope (MG). Participants performed microsurgical skill tests and a chicken femoral artery anastomosis before and after 10 hours of standardized training according to their assigned models. The CG performed the test twice without training. Performance was assessed by time to complete the anastomosis, University of Western Ontario Microsurgery Skills Assessment scale, anastomosis patency, and time to complete the round-the-clock test. Results: No significant differences were observed among groups at baseline. Significant improvement in anastomosis time was achieved in the MG (27.4 minutes, Conclusions: Basic microsurgical skills can be effectively learned using the smartphone training model, with performance improvements comparable to the microscope model. Its main limitation is the lack of stereoscopy.

Identifiers

PMID39712383
PMCPMC11661746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.