ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Orbital Bone Fracture Repair Evaluation Through 3-Dimensional Computational Reconstruction and Orbital Volumetric Assessment.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Three-dimensional (3D) models generated from computed tomography (CT) images efficiently and accurately complement surgical comprehension. Additionally, computer modeling provides a substrate for comparative analysis of the treated orbit volume. This study aimed to investigate cases of orbital bone fractures with regard to orbital-defect correction, through 3D computational structural modeling and evaluation of orbital volume. Methods: A total of 136 cases of orbital fractures with a diagnosis and surgical treatment were identified, of which 15 were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The construction of the preoperative and postoperative 3D models was based on CT images, supported by a medical imaging design system; this technique enabled the calculation of orbital volumetric measurements with the normal contralateral orbit as a reference. Results: Three-dimensional modeling in the preoperative and postoperative periods was performed for each patient. This study revealed that (1) preoperatively, the affected side had greater volume followed by postoperative reduction and (2) after surgical correction, the affected side had smaller volume and was equivalent to the unaffected side. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the periods (preoperative and postoperative) with regard to the mean and distribution of orbital volume or between the mean orbital volumes of the 2 sides. Conclusions: Using 3D computer modeling of bone structures, it is possible to evaluate orbital bone fractures after surgical correction. The effectiveness of preoperative and postoperative treatments was confirmed by comparing orbital volumetrics. It was not possible to assess soft tissues due to postoperative edema.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.