ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Visual, Refractive, Functional, and Patient Satisfaction Outcomes After Implantation of a New Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Update on Intraocular Lens Technology for Presbyopia Correction and Visual Outcomes.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- One-year outcomes after implantation of an EDOF intraocular lens in patients with cataract.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2025Observational
- Visual Quality and Symptomatology Following Implantation of a Non-Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing the clinical outcomes of a novel EDOF intraocular lens: a functional classification approach.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Toric Aberrometric Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens: Visual Outcomes, Rotational Stability, Patients' Satisfaction, and Spectacle Independence.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the visual, refractive, functional, and patient satisfaction outcomes of the Bi-Flex POB-MA 877PEY (Elon Patients and Methods: This was a prospective longitudinal descriptive study. Patients who underwent cataract surgery with the implantation of Bi-Flex POB-MA 877PEY IOL were included. Monocular refractive outcomes and visual acuity at distance, intermediate, and near were evaluated 1- and 3-month post-op. Binocular contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000, VectorVision, USA), binocular defocus curve, and patient satisfaction with the Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VFQ) were assessed at 3-month post-op. Results: 20 Bi-Flex POB-MA 877PEY IOL were implanted bilaterally in 10 patients. The mean age of the patients was 68.60±4.45 years. At 1-month post-op the monocular Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA), intermediate (CIVA) and near (CNVA) was 0.02±0.03, 0.29±0.08, and 0.40±0.05 LogMAR respectively. At 3-month post-op the CDVA decrease to 0.05±0.06 LogMAR (p=0.042), and CIVA and CNVA remained stable at 3-month post-op (p>0.05). No statistical differences were found in post-op spherical equivalent at 1 and 3 month (-0.03±0.19 D and -0.03±0.13 D; p=1.000). 100% of eyes were within ±0.5 D at 1 month and 3-month post-op. Binocular defocus curve shows a peak of maximum visual acuity (VA) at 0 D (0.00±0.04 LogMAR), and a constant and progressive decrease at -1.50 D, and -2.50 D (0.15±0.08 LogMAR and 0.33±0.10 LogMAR, respectively). Contrast sensitivity decreased at high spatial frequencies. In patient satisfaction at 3 months post-op, VFQ reveals that 90% of patients revealed no or minor difficulty with glare/flare and 100% of patients have no or minor difficulty with halos. In overall satisfaction, 80% of patients rate their vision between 8 and 9 from a scale from 0 to 10. Conclusion: The Bi-Flex POB-MA 877PEY EDoF IOL provides good visual outcomes for distance, and adequate intermediate vision, with low visual disturbances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.