ArticleThe journal of Tehran Heart Center2024
In-Hospital and Midterm Outcomes of Lead Extraction: A Single-Center Clinical Study.
Article in The journal of Tehran Heart Center, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rate of lead extraction has steadily increased alongside the extensive use of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Data on the complications and safety of this challenging procedure are limited. We investigated inhospital and midterm outcomes following lead extraction. Methods: Data were retrieved from 51 patients who underwent pacemaker/defibrillator lead extraction procedures at Tehran Heart Center between 2016 and 2021. The procedural success rate, patients' demographic characteristics, and inhospital and midterm procedure-related complications were investigated. Results: Fifty-one patients were enrolled, including 44 men (86.3%). A total of 109 leads were extracted, with a 90.2% complete procedural success rate. In-hospital death occurred in 4 patients (7.8%): 1 patient (1.9%) died from pneumonia, 1 (1.9%) from septic shock, and 2 (3.9%) from septic shock besides heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Adverse events in 3 patients (5.8%) were directly related to the procedure: 1 patient (1.9%) suffered lung laceration and hemorrhage, 1 (1.9%) sustained subclavian injury, and 1 (1.9%) developed tamponade. Neither reinfection nor rehospitalization was observed during follow-up. Conclusion: Lead extraction can be considered a highly successful procedure with a low rate of death-related events and complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.