ReviewJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2025
Injectable hydrogels for treating skin injuries in diabetic animal models: a systematic review.
Review in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced regenerative solutions in diabetic foot ulcer therapy: delivery of mesenchymal stem cells in injectable hydrogels.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Exploration of recent advancements of nanoparticle-based therapeutics emphasis on diabetic-related chronic wound management: a comprehensive review.Archives of pharmacal research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: One of the main causes of chronic wounds is diabetes mellitus (DM), a metabolic disease characterized by chronic hyperglycemia. In this context, hydrogels have been used as a promising treatment for stimulating tissue ingrowth and healing in these injuries. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the findings of studies that investigated the effects of injectable hydrogels of various origins on skin wound healing using in vivo experimental models in diabetic rats. Methods: This review was conducted in March 2023 using two databases, PubMed and Scopus, following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines and the SYRCLE (Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation). The following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) descriptors were used: "hydrogels," "injectable," "in vivo," "diabetes mellitus," and "skin wound dressing." Results: After the eligibility assessment, 12 studies were selected and analyzed from an initial 95 articles identified across databases. The studies demonstrated that a variety of injectable hydrogels showed biocompatibility and bioactivity, effectively interacting with skin tissue in diabetic wound models. These hydrogels were assessed for their compositions, structural properties, and in vivo effects on wound closure, inflammation reduction, and collagen deposition. Also, immunofluorescence analyses revealed increased expression of neoangiogenesis markers and reduced inflammatory factors in treated groups, highlighting the hydrogels potential for enhancing skin healing in diabetic wounds. Conclusion: Injectable hydrogels show significant potential as an effective treatment for diabetic skin wounds, though further clinical studies are needed to fully assess their biological performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.