ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2022
Common carotid artery characteristics in patients with repaired aortic coarctation compared to other cardiovascular risk factors.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of smoking on cardiovascular health: Mechanisms, epidemiology and specific concerns regarding congenital heart disease.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025Review
- Relationship between elevated homocysteine levels and the degree of white matter lesions in stroke patients.Medicine · 2025Observational
- Coarctation of the aorta and accelerated atherosclerosis: A contemporary review on the burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025Article
- Editor's corner & issue at a glance.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Increased common carotid artery (CCA) intima media thickness (cIMT) is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. cIMT thickening has been described in patients with repaired aortic coarctation (CoA), but data on mechanism and clinical relevance in this population are scarce. Our aim was to gain mechanistic insights into cIMT thickening of patients with repaired CoA by comparing their wall architecture to patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), other congenital heart diseases (oCHD), and healthy controls. Methods and results: A total of 310 subjects were included (CoA (n = 58), oCHD (n = 96), CAD (n = 68) and healthy controls (n = 88)). CIMT and lumen diameter (LD) were determined using semiautomated analysis software. Linear regression analyses were performed correcting for relevant covariates. While patients with repaired CoA and CAD both had significantly increased cIMT and cIMT/LD ratios, LD was increased only in CoA patients. Furthermore, patients with repaired CoA had decreased CCA stiffness. CCA characteristics in the oCHD group were not significantly different from controls. Conclusion: The mechanism of cIMT thickening in patients with repaired CoA may differ from CAD. While there is concentric remodeling in the latter, we see predominant eccentric remodeling in the CoA group, which could be due to increased flow as a result of compliance mismatch at the CoA repair site. We therefore suggest that the prognostic value of cIMT in post-CoA patients should be validated separately prior to using it to guide clinical management in this group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.