ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2022
Reduced ovarian function in women with complex congenital heart disease.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peripheral organ crosstalk in the regulation of ovarian endocrine function and reproductive homeostasis.Life medicine · 2025Review
- Time trends and birth rates in women with congenital heart disease; a nationwide cohort study from Norway 1994-2014.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2024Article
- Gynaecological health in adult congenital heart disease women: Addressing menorrhagia, infertility, contraception, menopause.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2023Review
- Congenital Heart Disease and Fertility: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study Including Both Men and Women.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Editor's corner & issue at a glance.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a high prevalence of menstrual disturbance in women with congenital heart disease (CHD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate ovarian function in women with CHD and factors associated with ovarian function. Design: Sixty-one women with more than moderate complexity of CHD who visited our hospital from March to December in 2019 were prospectively enrolled. We investigated menstrual bleeding patterns with a questionnaire. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, which reflect ovarian reserve, were measured in 43 women (28.1±8.7 years old) with CHD and 43 age-matched healthy women controls. Ratios of AMH levels to the median of reference values (provided by Beckman Coulter, Inc.) at each age were expressed as percentages (%AMH). The %AMH were evaluated for each clinical characteristic (oxygen saturation, NYHA class, Fontan circulation, cardiac complexity, physiological stage). Results: Menstrual cycle disorders were observed in 29 of 43 patients (68%) with CHD. The most frequent menstrual cycle disorder was frequent menstrual bleeding, observed in 14 patients (32%). Serum AMH levels were significantly lower in women with CHD than in controls (2.66±2.10 vs 4.55±4.02 ng/mL, P=0.008). The %AMH in women with Fontan circulation was significantly decreased, compared with those of controls [56.7 (1.1-152.4) % vs 94.6 (24.2-396.6) % P= 0.003]. The %AMH significantly reduced even in women with CHD whose oxygen saturation did not reduce (≧96%) [58.6 (4.9-313.9) % vs 94.6 (24.2-396.6) % P=0.033]. Conclusion: Measurements of AMH revealed reduced ovarian function that contributed to menstrual cycle disorders in patients with CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.