ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2023
Coronary artery disease in adults with congenital heart disease.
Review in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- New perspectives in the management of adults with congenital heart disease: insights from the 2025 ACHD Congress.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Impact of smoking on cardiovascular health: Mechanisms, epidemiology and specific concerns regarding congenital heart disease.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025Review
- Exploring the causal association between congenital heart disease and stroke based on two-sample Mendelian randomization.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Article
- Paradoxical Infarction? Inferior STEMI With Unexpected Discovery of ASD in an Oncology Patient: A Case of Combined Percutaneous Intervention.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- The Unique Challenge of Coronary Artery Disease in Adult Patients with Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Atherosclerotic Risk Factor Prevalence in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Successful Evolution of Atrial Septal Defect Closure in an Elderly Patient With Complex Cardiovascular Disease.CASE (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024Article
- A change of heart: Empowering adults with congenital heart disease for a healthy change.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing population of adult patients with congenital heart disease (ACHD) is at risk of developing coronary artery disease (CAD) and other atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases due to exposure to cardiovascular risk factors. The impact of this exposure is growing larger as life expectancy of these subjects increases with the progressive improvement in management of congenital heart disease. Studies have shown that ACHD patients have a higher risk for CAD than their non-ACHD matches, highlighting the need for awareness and prevention efforts among congenital heart disease specialists and non-ACHD cardiologists. At the same time, ACHD patients with CAD often present specific characteristics all practicing cardiologists should be aware of. While further research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms underlying the higher CAD risk in this population, this article summarizes key evidence on CAD in ACHD and emphasizes on one hand the importance of early screening and management of known cardiovascular risk factors in ACHD patients, particularly those who are younger, female, or have more complex/severe CHD. On the other hand, it calls for a broader knowledge of ACHD risk for CAD and its peculiarities among all cardiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.