ArticleBioelectricity2024
Modulating the Cell Death Immune Response for Electroporation Treatments.
Article in Bioelectricity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Focal therapeutic conditions matter: How energy affects antigen presentation and T cell activation.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
- Overcoming Therapy Resistance in Ovarian Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.Cancers · 2026Review
- Translating physical stress into biological signals: precision electro-oncology based on conformational changes of electro-sensitive receptors and parameterized immune remodeling.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Non-thermal venous endothelial injury by microsecond irreversible electroporation: mechanisms of apoptosis, oxidative stress, and vascular closure initiation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Characterization of glioma spheroid viability and metastatic potential following monophasic and biphasic pulsed electric fields.Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a minimally invasive ablation technique that compromises integrity of the cell membrane through the application of short duration, high voltage electric pulses to induce cell death. Adverse effects of IRE such as muscle contractions are reduced with higher frequency biphasic pulsing, commonly known as high-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE). IRE and H-FIRE treatments have shown to increase immune activation through the induction of both immediate and delayed cell death, indicated by the release of damage-associated molecular pathways, antigens, and proteins. In this study, we demonstrated that specific modes of cell death can be elicited by modifying the applied pulse width and electric field strength of various waveforms. Several assays were performed on a human glioblastoma cell line, seeded onto a 2D monolayer for electroporation treatments. Cleavage of Caspase 3/7 and Caspase 1, well-known indicators of apoptosis and pyroptosis, respectively, was quantified. Our results indicate that apoptotic activity was increased for shorter pulse widths and stronger electric fields, whereas pyroptotic activity displayed opposite trends being significantly dominant with longer pulse widths at lower applied electric fields. When clinically applied, the activation of specific cell death mechanisms can allow for controlling the extent of an electroporation-mediated immune response and subsequently improved overall patient survival. With this information, we could use an electrode array to spatially manipulate the elicited immune response for patient-specific treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.