Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712186›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Nomogram for predicting post-progression-free survival in patients with recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical surgery: a retrospective analysis.

Dailei Qin, Pu Xi, Kewei Huang, Lingmin Jiang, Zehui Yao, Ran Wei, Shengping Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dailei Qin *State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Pu Xi *State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Kewei Huang *State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Lingmin JiangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Zehui YaoState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Ran WeiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Shengping LiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radical resection is the only curative method for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, nearly 85% of PDAC patients suffer from local or distant recurrence within 5 years after curative resection. The progression of recurrent lesions accelerates the mortality rate in PDAC patients. However, the influence of clinicopathological factors on post-progression-free survival (PPFS), defined as the period from tumor recurrence to the timing of the progression of recurrent lesions, has rarely been discussed. The present study aimed to explore the independent prognostic factors for PPFS and construct a nomogram for PPFS prediction. Materials and methods: The 200 recurrent PDAC patients were divided into training and validation groups by leave-one-out cross-validation. The patients' clinicopathological characteristics were compared through a chi-square test. Meanwhile, these factors were enrolled in the univariate and multivariate COX regression to find the independent prognostic factors of PPFS. Moreover, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis based on the independent prognostic factors was performed. Finally, we constructed a nomogram model for PPFS prediction, followed by an effectiveness examination. Results: PDAC patients who received multi-agent chemotherapy after surgery showed a longer PPFS than the single-agent chemotherapy group. PDAC patients who received multi-agent chemotherapy after recurrence showed a similar PPFS compared to the single-agent chemotherapy group. Local recurrence with distant metastases, early recurrence, lympho-vascular invasion, higher T stage, and higher N stage predicted shorter PPFS in recurrent PDAC patients. Finally, a nomogram to indicate the progression of recurrent lesions was constructed. Conclusion: Multi-agent chemotherapy is recommended for PDAC patients after surgery. Meanwhile, single-agent chemotherapy also deserves consideration after tumor recurrence. Moreover, the nomogram could be used in PPFS prediction.

Indexed as

chemotherapynomogrampancreatic adenocarcinomapost-progression-free survivalrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID39712186
PMCPMC11659012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.