ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024
A novel dual-step transfer framework based on domain selection and feature alignment for motor imagery decoding.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exoskeleton-guided passive movement elicits standardized EEG patterns for generalizable BCIs in stroke rehabilitation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) based on motor imagery (MI), reducing calibration time is gradually becoming an urgent issue in practical applications. Recently, transfer learning (TL) has demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing calibration time in MI-BCI. However, the different data distribution of subjects greatly affects the application effect of TL in MI-BCI. Therefore, this paper combines data alignment, source domain selection, and feature alignment into the MI-TL. We propose a novel dual-step transfer framework based on source domain selection and feature alignment. First, the source and target domains are aligned using a pre-calibration strategy (PS), and then a sequential reverse selection method is proposed to match the optimal source domain for each target domain with the designed dual model selection strategy. We use filter bank regularization common space pattern (FBRCSP) to obtain more features and introduce manifold embedded distribution alignment (MEDA) to correct the prediction results of the support vector machine (SVM). The experimental results on two competition public datasets (BCI competition IV Dataset 1 and Dataset 2a) and our dataset show that the average classification accuracy of the proposed framework is higher than the baseline method (no domain selection and no feature alignment), which reaches 84.12%, 79.91%, and 78.45%, respectively. And the computational cost is reduced by half compared with the baseline method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.