ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024
A bimodal deep learning network based on CNN for fine motor imagery.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review of hybrid EEG-based multimodal human-computer interfaces using deep learning: applications, advances, and challenges.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
- NeuroFlex: Feasibility of EEG-Based Motor Imagery Control of a Soft Glove for Hand Rehabilitation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor imagery (MI) is an important brain-computer interface (BCI) paradigm. The traditional MI paradigm (imagining different limbs) limits the intuitive control of the outer devices, while fine MI paradigm (imagining different joint movements from the same limb) can control the mechanical arm without cognitive disconnection. However, the decoding performance of fine MI limits its application. Electroencephalogram (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) are widely used in BCI systems because of their portability and easy operation. In this study, a fine MI paradigm including four classes (hand, wrist, shoulder and rest) was designed, and the data of EEG-fNIRS bimodal brain activity was collected from 12 subjects. Event-related desynchronization (ERD) from EEG signals shows a contralateral dominant phenomenon, and there is difference between the ERD of the four classes. For fNIRS signal in the time dimension, the time periods with significant difference can be observed in the activation patterns of four MI tasks. Spatially, the signal peak based brain topographic map also shows difference of these four MI tasks. The EEG signal and fNIRS signal of these four classes are distinguishable. In this study, a bimodal fusion network is proposed to improve the fine MI tasks decoding performance. The features of these two modalities are extracted separately by two feature extractors based on convolutional neural networks (CNN). The recognition performance was significantly improved by the bimodal method proposed in this study, compared with the performance of the single-modal network. The proposed method outperformed all comparison methods, and achieved a four-class accuracy of 58.96%. This paper demonstrates the feasibility of EEG and fNIRS bimodal BCI systems for fine MI, and shows the effectiveness of the proposed bimodal fusion method. This research is supposed to support fine MI-based BCI systems with theories and techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.