ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024
Robust working memory in a two-dimensional continuous attractor network.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A working memory model based on recurrent neural networks using reinforcement learning.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Heterogeneous Forgetting Rates and Greedy Allocation in Slot-Based Memory Networks Promotes Signal Retention.Neural computation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous bump attractor networks (CANs) have been widely used in the past to explain the phenomenology of working memory (WM) tasks in which continuous-valued information has to be maintained to guide future behavior. Standard CAN models suffer from two major limitations: the stereotyped shape of the bump attractor does not reflect differences in the representational quality of WM items and the recurrent connections within the network require a biologically unrealistic level of fine tuning. We address both challenges in a two-dimensional (2D) network model formalized by two coupled neural field equations of Amari type. It combines the lateral-inhibition-type connectivity of classical CANs with a locally balanced excitatory and inhibitory feedback loop. We first use a radially symmetric connectivity to analyze the existence, stability and bifurcation structure of 2D bumps representing the conjunctive WM of two input dimensions. To address the quality of WM content, we show in model simulations that the bump amplitude reflects the temporal integration of bottom-up and top-down evidence for a specific combination of input features. This includes the network capacity to transform a stable subthreshold memory trace of a weak input into a high fidelity memory representation by an unspecific cue given retrospectively during WM maintenance. To address the fine-tuning problem, we test numerically different perturbations of the assumed radial symmetry of the connectivity function including random spatial fluctuations in the connection strength. Different to the behavior of standard CAN models, the bump does not drift in representational space but remains stationary at the input position.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.