Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712121›Full record

ReviewCognitive neurodynamics2024

Advances in brain-computer interface for decoding speech imagery from EEG signals: a systematic review.

Nimra Rahman, Danish Mahmood Khan, Komal Masroor, Mehak Arshad, Amna Rafiq, Syeda Maham Fahim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Research on auditory neurofeedback technology and its multi-disciplinary applications].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nimra RahmanDepartment of Telecommunications Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Sindh 75270 Pakistan.
Danish Mahmood KhanDepartment of Electronic Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Sindh 75270 Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8815-6146
Komal MasroorDepartment of Telecommunications Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Sindh 75270 Pakistan.
Mehak ArshadDepartment of Telecommunications Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Sindh 75270 Pakistan.
Amna RafiqDepartment of Telecommunications Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Sindh 75270 Pakistan.
Syeda Maham FahimDepartment of Telecommunications Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Sindh 75270 Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous individuals encounter challenges in verbal communication due to various factors, including physical disabilities, neurological disorders, and strokes. In response to this pressing need, technology has actively pursued solutions to bridge the communication gap, recognizing the inherent difficulties faced in verbal communication, particularly in contexts where traditional methods may be inadequate. Electroencephalogram (EEG) has emerged as a primary non-invasive method for measuring brain activity, offering valuable insights from a cognitive neurodevelopmental perspective. It forms the basis for Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) that provide a communication channel for individuals with neurological impairments, thereby empowering them to express themselves effectively. EEG-based BCIs, especially those adapted to decode imagined speech from EEG signals, represent a significant advancement in enabling individuals with speech disabilities to communicate through text or synthesized speech. By utilizing cognitive neurodevelopmental insights, researchers have been able to develop innovative approaches for interpreting EEG signals and translating them into meaningful communication outputs. To aid researchers in effectively addressing this complex challenge, this review article synthesizes key findings from state-of-the-art significant studies. It investigates into the methodologies employed by various researchers, including preprocessing techniques, feature extraction methods, and classification algorithms utilizing Deep Learning and Machine Learning approaches and their integration. Furthermore, the review outlines the potential avenues for future research, with the goal of advancing the practical implementation of EEG-based BCI systems for decoding imagined speech from a cognitive neurodevelopmental perspective.

Indexed as

Brain computer interface (BCI)Deep learningElectroencephalography (EEG)Imagined speechMachine learningSpeech imagery

Identifiers

PMID39712121
PMCPMC11655741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.