ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024
EEG-based deception detection using weighted dual perspective visibility graph analysis.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel Multi-Scale Entropy Approach for EEG-Based Lie Detection with Channel Selection.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Detection of suicide risk using event-related potentials: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychoradiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deception detection is a critical aspect across various domains. Integrating advanced signal processing techniques, particularly in neuroscientific studies, has opened new avenues for exploring deception at a deeper level. This study uses electroencephalogram (EEG) signals from a balanced cohort of 22 participants, consisting of both males and females, aged between 22 and 29, engaged in a visual task for instructed deception. We propose a novel approach in the realm of deception detection utilizing the Weighted Dual Perspective Visibility Graph (WDPVG) method to decode instructed deception by converting average epochs from each EEG channel into a complex network. Six graph-based features, including average and deviation of strength, weighted clustering coefficient, weighted clustering coefficient entropy, average weighted shortest path length, and modularity, are extracted, comprehensively representing the underlying brain dynamics associated with deception. Subsequently, these features are employed for classification using three distinct algorithms: K Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Decision Tree (DT). Experimental results reveal promising accuracy rates for KNN (66.64%), SVM (86.25%), and DT (82.46%). Furthermore, the features distributions of EEG networks are analyzed across different brain lobes, comparing truth-telling and lying modes. These analyses reveal the frontal and parietal lobes' potential in distinguishing between truth and deception, highlighting their active role during deceptive behavior. The findings demonstrate the WDPVG method's effectiveness in decoding deception from EEG signals, offering insights into the neural basis of deceptive behavior. This research could enhance the understanding of neuroscience and deception detection, providing a framework for future real-world applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.