ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024
Modelling neural probabilistic computation using vector symbolic architectures.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compositional neurosymbolic representations enable efficient active exploration.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Exploiting semantic information in a spiking neural SLAM system.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distributed vector representations are a key bridging point between connectionist and symbolic representations in cognition. It is unclear how uncertainty should be modelled in systems using such representations. In this paper we discuss how bundles of symbols in certain Vector Symbolic Architectures (VSAs) can be understood as defining an object that has a relationship to a probability distribution, and how statements in VSAs can be understood as being analogous to probabilistic statements. The aim of this paper is to show how (spiking) neural implementations of VSAs can be used to implement probabilistic operations that are useful in building cognitive models. We show how similarity operators between continuous values represented as Spatial Semantic Pointers (SSPs), an example of a technique known as fractional binding, induces a quasi-kernel function that can be used in density estimation. Further, we sketch novel designs for networks that compute entropy and mutual information of VSA-represented distributions and demonstrate their performance when implemented as networks of spiking neurons. We also discuss the relationship between our technique and quantum probability, another technique proposed for modelling uncertainty in cognition. While we restrict ourselves to operators proposed for Holographic Reduced Representations, and for representing real-valued data. We suggest that the methods presented in this paper should translate to any VSA where the dot product between fractionally bound symbols induces a valid kernel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.