Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712100›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024

Modelling neural probabilistic computation using vector symbolic architectures.

P Michael Furlong, Chris Eliasmith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P Michael FurlongCentre for Theoretical Neuroscience, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave., Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9503-8498
Chris EliasmithCentre for Theoretical Neuroscience, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave., Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distributed vector representations are a key bridging point between connectionist and symbolic representations in cognition. It is unclear how uncertainty should be modelled in systems using such representations. In this paper we discuss how bundles of symbols in certain Vector Symbolic Architectures (VSAs) can be understood as defining an object that has a relationship to a probability distribution, and how statements in VSAs can be understood as being analogous to probabilistic statements. The aim of this paper is to show how (spiking) neural implementations of VSAs can be used to implement probabilistic operations that are useful in building cognitive models. We show how similarity operators between continuous values represented as Spatial Semantic Pointers (SSPs), an example of a technique known as fractional binding, induces a quasi-kernel function that can be used in density estimation. Further, we sketch novel designs for networks that compute entropy and mutual information of VSA-represented distributions and demonstrate their performance when implemented as networks of spiking neurons. We also discuss the relationship between our technique and quantum probability, another technique proposed for modelling uncertainty in cognition. While we restrict ourselves to operators proposed for Holographic Reduced Representations, and for representing real-valued data. We suggest that the methods presented in this paper should translate to any VSA where the dot product between fractionally bound symbols induces a valid kernel.

Indexed as

Bayesian modellingFractional bindingProbabilitySpatial semantic pointersVector symbolic architecture

Identifiers

PMID39712100
PMCPMC11655797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.