ReviewCognitive neurodynamics2024
A review of ethical considerations for the medical applications of brain-computer interfaces.
Review in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain-Computer Interfaces: The Dawn of a New Era in Disease Treatment.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- From Tool to Agent: A Semi-Systematic Review of Human-AI Alignment and a Proposed Tiered Healing Ecosystem for Mental Health.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From technological closed-loop to human-machine trust: a systematic review of ethical and communication challenges of brain-computer interface in elderly care.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Ethics of brain-computer interface in mental healthcare.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- [Ethical considerations for artificial intelligence-enhanced brain-computer interface].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025Article
- [Technical maturity and bubble risks of brain-computer interface (BCI): Considerations from research to industrial translation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025Article
- Informed consent competency assessment for brain-computer interface clinical research and application in psychiatric disorders: A systematic review.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development and potential applications of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are directly related to the human brain and may have adverse effects on the users' physical and mental health. Ethical issues, particularly those associated with BCIs, including both non-medical and medical applications, have captured societal attention. This article initially reviews the application of three ethical frameworks in BCI technology: consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics. Subsequently, it introduces the ethical standards under consideration within the medical objective framework for BCI medical applications. Finally, the paper discusses and forecasts the ethical standards for BCI medical applications. The paper emphasizes the necessity to differentiate between the ethical issues of implantable and non-implantable BCIs, to approach the research on BCI-based "controlling the brain" with caution, and to establish standardized operational procedures and efficacy evaluation methods for BCI medical applications. This paper aims to provide ideas for the establishment of ethical standards in BCI medical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.