ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2022
Is there a role for angiotensin II-receptor blockers for ascending aorta dilatation in pediatric patients with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valve?
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently there are no data regarding medical therapy of aortic dilatation in pediatric patients with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Aim of the study was to describe the rates of change of aortic root diameters in untreated pediatric patients with normally functioning BAV and in patients with documented progressive dilatation treated with medical therapy. Methods: Retrospective analysis performed on 191 pediatric patients with normally functioning BAV followed from 2005 to 2021 with serial examinations. Results: Aortic root dilatation was observed in 46.3% of patients, was mainly localized at the proximal ascending aorta and judged mild. After a mean follow-up of 3.7 ± 2.7 years among 175 untreated patients 52.6% presented a new onset or progressive aortic root dilatation ("progressive") while 47.4% presented normal and stable aortic diameters. Eight percent of untreated patients with a mild aortic dilatation at baseline presented a normalization of aortic diameters. "Progressive" patients presented more frequently a BAV with a raphe (73.9% vs 57.8%, p = .037) and a mild aortic regurgitation (76% vs 45.8%, p = .00007). Thirty "progressive" patients were treated with medical therapy. After a mean follow-up of 3.3 ± 2.3 years no significant differences were observed between aortic root z score progression in "stable", "progressive" and "treated" patients. Conclusions: In a small cohort of patients with normally functioning BAV a raphe and a mild regurgitation are common in progressive aortic dilatation. Medical therapy didn't affect aortic dilatation in patients with progressive and mild dilatation. A randomized controlled trial is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.