Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712045›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2022

The role of sensitization in post-transplant outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease sensitization in adults with congenital heart disease.

Laith Alshawabkeh, Nicole L Herrick, Alexander R Opotowsky, Tajinder P Singh, Michael Landzberg, Marcus A Urey, Wida Cherikh, Joseph W Rossano, Michael M Givertz

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laith AlshawabkehFrom the Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California San Diego, United States.
Nicole L HerrickFrom the Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California San Diego, United States.
Alexander R OpotowskyDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Tajinder P SinghDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Michael LandzbergDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Marcus A UreyFrom the Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California San Diego, United States.
Wida CherikhUnited Network for Organ Sharing, United States.
Joseph W RossanoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, United States.
Michael M GivertzDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The number of heart transplants in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) is increasing, though outcomes remain unfavorable compared to those without CHD. The etiology of this mortality difference remains uncertain. Panel reactive antibody (PRA) is a predictor of survival post-transplantation, and adult CHD patients have been observed to have higher PRA levels. Here we assessed the relationship between PRA and outcomes in adult patients with CHD who underwent heart transplantation. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study using the 2004-2015 ISHLT Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry to investigate the role of sensitization in the observed excess mortality. The composite outcome of mortality or graft failure within 1-year of transplantation was compared among CHD vs. non-CHD recipients, according to sensitization as measured by pre-transplant panel reactive antibodies (PRA). Results: Adults with CHD (n = 1188) had higher PRA level compared to non-CHD (n = 38,201) recipients (27% vs. 18% PRA>10%, respectively, p < 0.001). CHD diagnosis remained independently associated with a higher incidence of the composite outcome in multivariable analysis after adjusting for PRA and other variables. Further, even after age-matching, patients with CHD and PRA ≤10% were at higher risk of the primary outcome compared to non-CHD (OR 2.1 [1.4-3.4], p = 0.001), though both groups had comparable outcomes when PRA was >10% (OR 1.1 [0.6-2.0], p = 0.852). Conclusions: Adults with CHD are more likely to have higher sensitization and worse outcomes than non-CHD recipients. Higher sensitization rates alone do not fully explain their excess risk of adverse outcomes after heart transplantation.

Indexed as

Adult congenital heart diseasePanel reactive antibodyPost-transplant outcomesSensitization

Identifiers

PMID39712045
PMCPMC11657251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.