ArticleFrontiers in transplantation2024
Autologous porcine VRAM flap model for VCA research.
Article in Frontiers in transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: As research advances in vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA), large animal models are essential for translational studies related to immune rejection and graft survival. However, procurement of large flaps can cause significant defects, complicating wound closure and increasing postoperative risks. This study details the surgical techniques and outcomes of autologous vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap transplantation and neck flap isolation with induced ischemia in a swine model. The purpose of this study was to identify the most effective control procedure for use in future VRAM flap allotransplantation research. Methods: We performed two left heterotopic autologous VRAM flap transplants and two right anterolateral neck flap isolations using female Yucatan pigs. Postoperatively, animals were monitored for complications and flap healing, with punch biopsies taken on POD1, 5, and at the end of the study for histological analysis. Transcutaneous oxygen and temperature were also recorded. Results: Both autologous flaps survived after vessel anastomosis, with effective closure of abdominal defects using suturable mesh, and no postoperative complications were observed. Histology revealed mild dermal edema and perivascular inflammation on POD5. In the neck flap group, both flaps survived temporary ischemia, however, postoperative complications included dorsal flap necrosis and wound dehiscence, requiring reoperation. No gross inflammation or edema was observed following surgery and histologically there was only mild dermal edema on POD5. Discussion: We have developed a low-risk, technically feasible porcine autologous VRAM flap transplantation model and our findings support its use in future VCA studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.