Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712013›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2024

Modular (universal) CAR-T platforms

Afraa Mohammad, Anna Yurina, Tatiana Simonyan, Daniil Chistyakov, Rand Salman, Ksenia Zornikova, Elizaveta Minina, Apollinariya Bogolyubova

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Oncology research · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Afraa MohammadNational Medical Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia.
Anna YurinaNational Medical Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia.
Tatiana SimonyanNational Medical Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia.
Daniil ChistyakovNational Medical Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia.
Rand SalmanNational Medical Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia.
Ksenia ZornikovaNational Medical Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia.
Elizaveta MininaNational Medical Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia.
Apollinariya BogolyubovaNational Medical Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Modular (universal) CAR T-platforms were developed to combat the limitations of traditional CAR-T therapy, allowing for multiple targeting of tumor-associated antigens and the ability to control CAR-T cell activity. The modular CAR-T platform consists of a universal receptor (signaling module) that recognizes an adapter molecule on the soluble module, which is responsible for antigen recognition. Multiple platforms have been developed over the last 12 years, and some of them have entered the clinical trial phase. This systematic review seeks to evaluate the different parameters of modular CAR-T platforms performance in animal models. Methods: A systematic search of literature in the PubMed database and in Google Scholar and BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine) search engines was performed according to predefined eligibility criteria. All studies conducted on xenograft mouse models with any variant of modular CAR-T platforms were included. Forest plots were generated for visual presentation of the extracted quantitative findings (standardized mean difference (SMD) and median survival rate (MSR)). Results: A total of 33 studies employing 15 different modular CAR-T platforms were included. The platforms varied in terms of CAR-T cells, soluble module doses, and their frequency of administration. The studies showed a reduction in tumor burden and in tumor volume compared to the combined negative group. In comparison with the positive control group, there was no significant change in tumor burden or volume. In all the included studies the experimental group had a higher survival probability compared to the combined negative group at the study endpoint, with no significant difference in survival rate compared to the positive control group. Conclusion: The modular CAR-T platforms are generally effective and are a valuable addition to the arsenal of CAR therapy. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023443984.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmHumansMiceT-LymphocytesXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntigens, NeoplasmReceptors, Chimeric Antigenmodular CAR Tpre-clinical studysystematic reviewuniversal CAR Txenograft model

Identifiers

PMID39712013
PMCPMC11659234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.