Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712008›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2024

Heparin in sepsis: current clinical findings and possible mechanisms.

Sihan Yu, Yawen Chi, Xiaochun Ma, Xu Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Regulated cell death-induced coagulation dysfunction in sepsis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dynamic HGI trajectories and their impact on survival in patients with sepsis: a machine learning prognostic model.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sihan YuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Yawen ChiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Xiaochun MaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Xu LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a clinical syndrome resulting from the interaction between coagulation, inflammation, immunity and other systems. Coagulation activation is an initial factor for sepsis to develop into multiple organ dysfunction. Therefore, anticoagulant therapy may be beneficial for sepsis patients. Heparin possesses a variety of biological activities, so it has a broad prospect in sepsis. Previous studies suggested that patients with sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation and high disease severity might be suitable for anticoagulant therapy. With the development of artificial intelligence (AI), recent studies have shown that patients with severe coagulation activation represent the targeted patients for anticoagulant therapy in sepsis. However, it remains necessary to accurately define the relevant biomarkers indicative of this phenotype and validate their clinical utility by large randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Analyses of data from early small RCTs, subgroup analyses of large RCTs and meta-analyses have collectively suggested that anticoagulant therapy, particularly the use of heparin, may be an effective approach for managing sepsis patients. Concurrently, debate persists regarding the optimal selection of anticoagulants, proper timing, usage and dosage of administration that should be employed to assess treatment efficacy. The primary mechanisms of heparin are acting on heparan sulfate, histones, high mobility group box 1 and heparin-binding protein, which interfere with the regulation of inflammation, vascular permeability, coagulation, endothelial function and other biological activities. However, the underlying pathophysiological processes mediating the potential therapeutic effects of heparin in the context of sepsis remain incompletely understood and warrant additional rigorous investigation to establish the mechanism more conclusively.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsHeparinSepsisAnimalsBiomarkersBlood CoagulationDisseminated Intravascular CoagulationHumansAnticoagulantsBiomarkersHeparinanticoagulantcoagulationheparinmechanismsepsis

Identifiers

PMID39712008
PMCPMC11659142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.