Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39711926›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Revolutionising Anatomy Education: The Current Role of Digital Technologies in Enhancing Anatomy Learning for Undergraduate Medical Students.

Fang Fang Quek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fang Fang QuekClinical Education, Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anatomy education, which forms the cornerstone of today's medical education, has traditionally centered on cadaveric dissections and prosections as its core teaching methods. However, these methods present with challenges, including student anxiety, nausea, and limited cadaver availability. Recent advancements in digital technologies have led to the proliferation of innovative learning tools, introducing novel and transformative approaches to enhance anatomy education. While numerous studies explore the potential applications of innovative technologies in anatomy education, few studies have examined their current application in anatomy teaching for undergraduate medical students. This gap in the literature is significant, as understanding the usability and acceptance of digital tools in anatomy teaching is crucial for ensuring that students receive high-quality education. To address this, a comprehensive review was undertaken to explore the breadth of research activity in this field, exploring the integration of digital technologies in anatomy teaching. This review aimed to address the research question: "How are digital technologies currently being used in the delivery of anatomy teaching in undergraduate medical education?". A systematic search was performed across multiple databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, with studies screened using Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia), a web-based software platform. Eligible studies were systematically reviewed and data extracted and organised, with findings presented graphically, accompanied by descriptive narratives. Our findings indicate that while innovative digital tools are increasingly being adopted, many medical schools continue to rely predominantly on traditional cadaver-based methods for anatomy teaching. Only a limited number of institutions have fully integrated digital technologies into their teaching practices. Additionally, traditional approaches, such as cadaveric dissections and prosections, remain the preferred choice among students for learning anatomy. A commonly reported limitation of digital tools is their difficulty in effectively conveying spatial relationships between anatomical structures, a critical component in anatomy learning. Despite this, recent studies have revealed that students and educators increasingly value multimodal approaches that combine traditional cadaver-based teaching methods with digital tools to enhance anatomy learning. This review provides valuable insights into how digital technology is currently being utilised in anatomy teaching for undergraduate medical students. We found that while various innovative pedagogical approaches have been adopted in anatomy teaching, traditional methods such as cadaveric dissections and prosections remain the most preferred by students. While digital technology is increasingly being used to complement anatomical education, modern anatomy teaching currently adopts an integrated and multimodal approach, utilising various pedagogical methods to enhance anatomy learning. It is therefore essential that educators recognise that no single pedagogical approach suits all students and a combination of various modalities is often required to meet diverse learning needs in anatomy teaching.

Indexed as

anatomydigitaleducationlearningtechnology

Identifiers

PMID39711926
PMCPMC11661898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.