ReviewCureus2024
Revolutionising Anatomy Education: The Current Role of Digital Technologies in Enhancing Anatomy Learning for Undergraduate Medical Students.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the effects of 3D videos and structured peer discussions on anatomy learning: A four-arm randomized controlled trial.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Trial
- Medical student's perceptions of modern educational technologies in anatomy at VinUniversity, Vietnam: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Interactive, Image-Based Modules as a Complement to Prosection-Based Anatomy Laboratories: Multicohort Evaluation.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Effective approaches towards teaching human anatomy among MBBS students in India.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anatomy education, which forms the cornerstone of today's medical education, has traditionally centered on cadaveric dissections and prosections as its core teaching methods. However, these methods present with challenges, including student anxiety, nausea, and limited cadaver availability. Recent advancements in digital technologies have led to the proliferation of innovative learning tools, introducing novel and transformative approaches to enhance anatomy education. While numerous studies explore the potential applications of innovative technologies in anatomy education, few studies have examined their current application in anatomy teaching for undergraduate medical students. This gap in the literature is significant, as understanding the usability and acceptance of digital tools in anatomy teaching is crucial for ensuring that students receive high-quality education. To address this, a comprehensive review was undertaken to explore the breadth of research activity in this field, exploring the integration of digital technologies in anatomy teaching. This review aimed to address the research question: "How are digital technologies currently being used in the delivery of anatomy teaching in undergraduate medical education?". A systematic search was performed across multiple databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, with studies screened using Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia), a web-based software platform. Eligible studies were systematically reviewed and data extracted and organised, with findings presented graphically, accompanied by descriptive narratives. Our findings indicate that while innovative digital tools are increasingly being adopted, many medical schools continue to rely predominantly on traditional cadaver-based methods for anatomy teaching. Only a limited number of institutions have fully integrated digital technologies into their teaching practices. Additionally, traditional approaches, such as cadaveric dissections and prosections, remain the preferred choice among students for learning anatomy. A commonly reported limitation of digital tools is their difficulty in effectively conveying spatial relationships between anatomical structures, a critical component in anatomy learning. Despite this, recent studies have revealed that students and educators increasingly value multimodal approaches that combine traditional cadaver-based teaching methods with digital tools to enhance anatomy learning. This review provides valuable insights into how digital technology is currently being utilised in anatomy teaching for undergraduate medical students. We found that while various innovative pedagogical approaches have been adopted in anatomy teaching, traditional methods such as cadaveric dissections and prosections remain the most preferred by students. While digital technology is increasingly being used to complement anatomical education, modern anatomy teaching currently adopts an integrated and multimodal approach, utilising various pedagogical methods to enhance anatomy learning. It is therefore essential that educators recognise that no single pedagogical approach suits all students and a combination of various modalities is often required to meet diverse learning needs in anatomy teaching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.