ArticleCureus2024
Factors Influencing Patient-Centered Care and Shared Decision-Making in Primary Care Settings in Saudi Arabia: A Scoping Review.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making in the South Korean healthcare system.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Shared Decision-Making in Dialysis Modality Selection Among Adults with Advanced Kidney Disease in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of the Saudi Health Sector Transformation Program (SHSTP): A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Patient-Centered Care and Digital Health Adoption.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Examining the mediating role of intrinsic motivation in Laissez-Faire leadership and nurses' task performance: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has undergone many reforms in light of Vision 2030, and the health sector is no exception. Vision 2030 highlights the importance of utilization and increased quality in primary care. Patient-centered care (PCC) and shared decision-making (SDM) are two methods used to increase healthcare quality globally. However, there is limited research on the implementation of such methods in primary care within Saudi Arabia. Thus, this scoping review aims to address this gap by investigating the different factors influencing the implementation of PCC and SDM in primary care in Saudi Arabia. The scoping review completed a comprehensive search of three databases, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, resulting in eight articles that met the inclusion criteria. The review found three major themes of influencing factors: patient-specific factors, physician-specific factors, and health system and external factors. The review highlights the lack of research in this area and provides context for the implementation of new reforms and policies in relation to PCC and SDM in primary care in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Most notably, it emphasizes the importance of increasing health literacy, improving physician training, investigating cultural influence, and enhancing policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.