ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2024
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy of commercial Chinese polyherbal preparation for coronary microvascular dysfunction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Potential therapeutic mechanisms ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of Xueshuantong injection on myocardial injury and residual cardiovascular risk in patients with unstable angina.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Improving angiogenesis in the ischemic myocardium is a therapeutic strategy for preventing, reducing, and repairing myocardial injury of coronary artery disease (CAD). Purpose: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the role of PNS in improving angiogenesis after myocardial infarction (MI) and explain the mechanism of PNS in improving angiogenesis in CAD from an epigenetic perspective. Study Design: The MI rat model was established by ligating the left anterior descending coronary artery permanently. The in vitro model comprised hypoxic human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCEACs). The mice and cells were then treated with PNS. Methods: Blood tests, histomorphology, polymerase chain reaction, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Western blotting, and MassARRAY targeted methylation detection analyses were conducted in vivo and in vitro to investigate the potential mechanisms of PNS. Results: Oral PNS significantly improved myocardial injury and activated angiogenesis in MI rats. DNA methylation analysis in vitro revealed that PNS decreased the hypermethylation of microRNA 200a (miR200a). PNS improved angiogenesis in hypoxic human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCEACs) by regulating the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway. Conclusion: Our research shows that PNS can improve angiogenesis in rats with MI and hypoxic HCEACs and affect the level of miR200a promoter methylation and miR200a and VEGF molecular pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.