ArticleGMS journal for medical education2024
Specialist training in general practice: Developments in social-legislation-based support - a data-driven introduction.
Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Comprehensive provision of general healthcare (i.e. primary care) within the populace is contingent on there being enough general practitioners (GPs) in proximity to patients. It is no longer the case that vacated allocated positions for primary-care physicians are being filled in all regions. Support for specialist training in general medical practice is one of the measures intended to ensure provision of GP services. This analytical project aims to make a data-driven contribution to gauging the impact of such support on primary care in Germany, while also delivering pointers for further research. Methods: On the basis of routinely collected data, the history of such support was examined in detail for all practice-based, statutory health insurance (SHI)-accredited GPs during the period 2016-2022. In the analysis, GPs were broken down by whether they took up full-time or part-time roles, self-employed or salaried roles, and roles in a practice or in an ambulatory healthcare centre (MVZ). Results: During the period under review, the proportion of those who have both recently commenced work as SHI-accredited GPs and had previously used support for their specialist training, increased from 57% to 81%. The total number of new GPs (headcount) rose from 1,590 to 1,955. Results indicate that those who had availed themselves of this support take up self-employed and full-time roles more often than those who had not. Conclusions: Both take-up of support for specialist training, and the number of new GPs, increased markedly during the period under review. The data does not indicate any causal links. However, these results could form a jumping-off point for further research (in general) into support for specialist training, and (in particular) into how this may impact these individuals' subsequent work roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.