Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39711871›Full record

ArticleGMS journal for medical education2024

Lateral entry into general practice - an explorative analysis of general practice trainees in the competence centre for postgraduate medical education Baden-Württemberg.

Jonathan Ko, Katja Krug, Christian Förster, Tanja Jähnig, Martina Bischoff, Christine Becker, Simon Schwill

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan KoHeidelberg University Hospital, Department of General Medicine and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katja KrugHeidelberg University Hospital, Department of General Medicine and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian FörsterUniversity Hospital Tübingen, Institute for General Medicine and Interprofessional Care, Tübingen, Germany.
Tanja JähnigUniversity Hospital Ulm, Institute for General Medicine, Ulm, Germany.
Martina BischoffUniversity Medical Center Freiburg, Institute of General Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Christine BeckerHeidelberg University Hospital, Department of General Medicine and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Simon SchwillHeidelberg University Hospital, Department of General Medicine and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To aid the shortage of general practitioners (GPs) in Germany, since 2011 medical specialists from other fields may switch specialisation by undergoing a slim-lined training programme (lateral entry) into general practice (GP). Available published qualitative and quantitative data on lateral entrants (LEs) is scarce. Aim of the study was an explorative analysis of LEs in the competence centre for postgraduate medical education Baden-Wuerttemberg (KWBW). Methods: In 2016, a multicentric cohort study was initiated including all GP trainees entering the KWBW. Data from 2016 to 2022 was included (T0). A follow-up with graduates from the KWBW was performed once in 2023 (T1). Surveys at T0 and T1 were self-developed, piloted, and included questions on social demography, education, qualification, current training, working environment and professional plans. Dataset was analysed exploratively. Results: At T0, 884 GP trainees participated (response 95.2%). 23.8% of participants were LEs (N=210). Most LEs were specialists from anaesthesiology (34.8%), internal medicine (28.5%) and surgery (20.6%). LEs had been working in their previous specialty for a median of 3 years before starting GP-training. At T0, LEs were seven years older than their colleagues (p<0,001). The proportion of men among LEs was higher (34.3% vs 25.1%, p=0,009). LEs were more decisive to open their own GP practice (p=0,009). At T1, 48 LEs participated of which 92% were practising GPs (N=36). 64,5% considered themselves rural GPs and work in communities <20.000 people (N=36). LEs mainly choose GP because of its specific way of working, job dissatisfaction and personal motives such as opportunity to start a practice. Most LEs strongly agreed that they would switch to GP again. Discussion: LEs are a relevant party among GP trainees. Many LEs become self-employed and contribute essentially to providing primary care. Lateral entry attracts specialists, also from rural areas, seeking for professional satisfaction. This is why LEs should follow their new path within a regional competence centre providing GP specific courses, mentoring and a professional network. Conclusions: LEs graduating from KWBW have become an important pillar of primary care in Baden-Wuerttemberg.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateGeneral PracticeAdultCareer ChoiceClinical CompetenceCohort StudiesFemaleGeneral PractitionersGermanyHumansMaleSpecializationSurveys and Questionnairescompetence centresfamily medicinegeneral practicelateral entrypostgraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID39711871
PMCPMC11656172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.