ArticleGMS journal for medical education2024
Design, development and implementation of a national faculty development program to promote CBME in graduate medical education in Switzerland.
Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment in competency-based medical education for anesthesiology: validity evidence, equity, and faculty readiness.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Competency Based Medical Education (CBME) is a global movement in graduate medical training but implementation on a national scale is challenging. One crucial element of fostering CBME is to establish faculty development. We report the design of a national program, the process of implementation, and the results of the first two years. Methods: Following Kern's cycle of curriculum development, a group of medical education experts designed a training program covering the basic skills for teaching in clinical settings. In addition, we outlined a qualification pathway for future educators in the program. Results: The program was built upon 1-day-workshops with the topics: "clinical teaching", "feedback and assessment", "clinical leadership", "supporting trainees in difficulties". More than 30 workshops were delivered in two language regions to more than 500 clinical teachers. The median rating whether participants' expectations were met was 9 (of 10 points, IQR 8-9). The qualification pathway for future educators in the program included a nomination, a 2.5-day introductory workshop, shadowing of workshops, and stepwise acquisition of workshop parts as an educator candidate. Discussion: This faculty development program was well attended and well-received. Using Kern's established model for the design process including an extensive needs assessment helped to serve the goals of the program. Developing future educators for expanding this program proved resource intensive. Conclusion: Implementing a national faculty development program was successful based on a rigorous design process, a highly motivated expert team, and learning content tailored to the needs of the audience. Effects on the implementation of CBME still need to be evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.