ArticleGMS journal for medical education2024
Perceptions of supervision and feedback in PaedCompenda, the competency-based, post-graduate curriculum in pediatrics (www.paedcompenda.de).
Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Both teachers and learners had clear reservations in the beginning about the usefulness and benefits of supervision and feedback, which were to be implemented as a teaching method in the competency-based, post-graduate curriculum in general ambulatory pediatrics, known as PaedCompenda (www.paedcompenda.de). This paper investigates the different perceptions of the physicians undergoing specialist training ( Method: The following data were collected as part of the research on the three-year-long implementation (2019-2023):1) Four focus group discussions (N=28) with physician trainees who had no experience in primary care pediatrics or with the post-graduate curriculum;2) Problem-oriented interviews, one at the beginning and again at the end, with physician trainees (N=28) undergoing specialist training at 19 participating medical practices belonging to two post-graduate education networks;3) Videos of patient consultations with the physician trainees (N=23);4) Videos of feedback conferences regarding the videotaped patient consultations (N=7).This data was evaluated using reconstructive grounded theory. Results: A distinctly more positive perception of the benefits of supervision and feedback as a teaching and learning method was seen in the physicians who received specialist training at the practices following the PaedCompenda curriculum. In regard to method, it is crucial that the educational setting can be experienced as a learning opportunity. Playing a central role in this is constructive and conducive feedback (a. dysfunctional routines, b. underlying lack of confidence, and c. overlooked problems). Conclusions: This paper shows the opportunities of an institutionalized form of supervision and feedback as part of a competency-based, post-graduate curriculum while also making it clear that implementation is challenging. Furthermore, the medical specialists who serve as trainers need to be specifically trained to know which approaches promote learning effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.