ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2025
Femoral intramedullary nail extraction using the kissing nail technique when primary measures fail.
Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intramedullary femoral nails (IMFNs) need to be removed for subsequent joint replacement, refracture, nonunion, or infection. The tools used to extract newer IMFNs may not be suited for removal of older implants, especially if broken. The purpose of this study was to describe a novel technique in femoral nail extraction when primary measures fail and a report on 6 cases where it was used. Technical Procedure: The technique is used after standard techniques including the Winquist set fail. A guide rod is passed through the center of the incarcerated nail (IN) to the distal end or to the proximal end if it is a retrograde nail. The femur is approached through a separate incision either through the knee for an antegrade nail or through the proximal femur for a retrograde nail. The guide rod is delivered through the opposite end by either hitting it through the end of the bone or breaching the end with a starting wire and starting reamer. The guide rod is then delivered into the field. Using flexible reamers over the delivered guide rod, the femur is reamed up to the IN. A second IMN slightly smaller in diameter is chosen and passed to touch the distal end of the IN, guided by the guide rod to keep the nails aligned. The second nail is impacted, which pushes the IN out its insertion point. Discussion: Hardware extraction is difficult for any surgeon, and extraction of older or broken nails with lower grade material poses even greater challenges. This technique is meant as an extra tool for avoidance of corticotomy when primary means for nail extraction have failed. We present 6 cases with 5 successful results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.