ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Intra-arterial cocktail therapy for patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who achieved endovascular reperfusion.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04202549 (Improving Neuroprotective Strategy for Ischemic Stroke With Sufficient Recanalization After Thrombectomy by Intra-arterial Cocktail Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Neuroprotective Strategy for Ischemic Stroke With Sufficient Recanalization After Thrombectomy by Intra-arterial Cocktail Therapy (INSIST-CT): a Prospective, Single Arm, Pilot Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of clinical efficacy between argatroban and tirofiban in patients with atherosclerotic cerebral infarction complicated by early neurological deterioration.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Association Between Argatroban and Outcomes of Branch Atheromatous Disease: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From MRI-Based Study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinically ineffective reperfusion (CIR) refers to the discrepancy between successful reperfusion and a favorable functional outcome in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke after endovascular treatment (EVT). The Improving Neuroprotective Strategy for Ischemic Stroke with Sufficient Recanalization after Thrombectomy by Intra-arterial Cocktail Therapy (INSIST-CT) trial aimed to explore the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of intra-arterial cocktail therapy using argatroban, dexamethasone, and edaravone in patients who achieved sufficient reperfusion after EVT. Methods: In this prospective, single-arm, pilot study, eligible patients with anterior circulation LVO who achieved sufficient reperfusion after EVT were enrolled in the INSIST-CT trial. Consecutive patients who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included in the control group retrospectively. In the INSIST-CT group, argatroban, dexamethasone, and edaravone were continuously administered for 30 min into the culprit artery after sufficient recanalization. The primary endpoint was the proportion of favorable functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses were performed to account for multiple confounders. Results: A total of 30 patients were included in the INSIST-CT group, and 261 patients were included in the control group. The proportion of the patients with the primary endpoint was 60% in the INSIST-CT group and 55.9% in the control group (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% CI 0.55-2.61, Conclusion: In anterior circulation, LVO patients who achieved sufficient reperfusion after EVT, bridging intra-arterial cocktail therapy with argatroban, dexamethasone, and edaravone may be safe and feasible. However, it did not improve the 90-day functional outcomes. A numerically higher probability of a favorable outcome in the INSIST-CT group suggests the potential promise of this cocktail therapy in reducing clinically ineffective reperfusion. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04202549.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.