ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2024
A national Australian Congenital Heart Disease registry; methods and initial results.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging communication gaps to improve adult congenital heart disease care: patient perspectives from a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Using big data to search for possible geographic clustering of Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) across Australia.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Mortality rates in adults with severe congenital heart disease: insights from the National Congenital Heart Disease Registry of Australia.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025Article
- A detailed profiling study from the national Australian Congenital Heart Disease registry: rationale and design.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025Article
- Living with congenital heart disease: a qualitative study to explore psychosocial impacts in adulthood.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025Article
- Excellent medium to long term outcomes after cardiac surgery for moderate and complex congenital heart disease, regardless of geographic location.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although several National Data Registries for Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) exist, few are comprehensive and contemporary. A National Australian CHD Registry has been developed that aims to redress this by creating the first comprehensive data collection for CHD children and adults, initially across Australia. Methods: We defined and collected a minimum dataset of demographics, diagnoses, and procedures from people with CHD presenting at participating quaternary CHD services Australia-wide. Data were collected from a range of clinical data sources. Diagnoses and procedures were standardised to the European Paediatric Congenital Code - Short List. Methodological limitations were carefully documented. Results: From 8 participating institutions, an initial 359,084 patient records were assessed for eligibility and 68,234 unique individuals with structural CHD have been included in the current dataset. There were 20,395 (30 %) people with mild CHD, 25,157 (37 %) with moderate CHD, and 13,530 (20 %) with severe CHD (6 % unknown complexity). The most common diagnoses were Ventricular Septal Defect (16,781, 25 %), Atrial Septal Defect (6,607, 10 %), Aortic Valve Disorders (5516 8 %), Coarctation of the Aorta (5,321, 8 %), Tetralogy of Fallot (4,489, 7 %), Transposition of the Great Arteries (4,009, 6 %). Conclusion: The data presented here represents the most comprehensive cohort collected for the Australian CHD population thus far and is comparable with the largest contemporary CHD registries around the world. This Registry represents a key resource for improved understanding of the CHD population and will drive better care and outcomes for people living with CHD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.