Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39711753›Full record

ReviewBrain and neuroscience advances

Review of the gastric physiology of disgust: Proto-nausea as an under-explored facet of the gut-brain axis.

Sameer N B Alladin, Ruth Judson, Poppy Whittaker, Angela S Attwood, Edwin S Dalmaijer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain and neuroscience advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Brain and neuroscience advances
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sameer N B AlladinSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Ruth JudsonSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Poppy WhittakerSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Angela S AttwoodSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Edwin S DalmaijerSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3241-0760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans feel visceral disgust when faced with potential contaminants like bodily effluvia. The emotion serves to reject potentially contaminated food and is paired with proto-nausea: alterations in gastric rhythm in response to disgust. Here, we offer a narrative synthesis of the existing literature on the effects of disgust on the stomach as measured through electrogastrography, a non-invasive technique that measures stomach activity with electrodes placed on the abdominal skin surface. After identifying and assessing 368 studies for eligibility and inclusion based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses process, we reviewed a final sample of only 10 articles that employed electrogastrography to assess gastric responses to unpleasant stimuli, including disgust elicitors. Reviewed findings illustrate that changes in gastric rhythm are associated with negatively valenced emotions, and most reliably with visceral disgust elicitors. This rhymes with recent evidence for a causal role of gastric state in reductions in visceral disgust avoidance. Because limitations in the reviewed body of work come from the low number of studies and relatively small sample sizes, we strongly encourage studies of proto-nausea in designs with higher statistical power, ideally paired with experimental manipulations of gastric state.

Indexed as

Disgustelectrogastrographyemotiongastric rhythmgut–brain axis

Identifiers

PMID39711753
PMCPMC11662309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.