ReviewDigital health
Exploring ways to improve knee osteoarthritis care: The role of mobile apps in enhancing therapeutic exercise-a systematic review.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Exercise intervention for rumination: from neural mechanisms to clinical applications.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Influencing factors of flexion contracture among patients with knee osteoarthritis: a multi-center retrospective cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bioengineering Support in the Assessment and Rehabilitation of Low Back Pain.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Musculoskeletal Diseases: Aetiology, Clinical Implications, Rehabilitation and Treatment.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Development of a mobile APP to promote physical activity in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: the "Move for Knee"™ study protocol.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Osteoarthritis (OA), particularly knee OA, is a leading cause of disability and poses significant challenges in healthcare management. Mobile applications (apps) have emerged as potential tools to support therapeutic exercise by providing tailored programs, instructional content, and progress tracking. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of mobile apps in enhancing therapeutic exercise for knee OA management. Methods: A systematic review was conducted, analyzing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the impact of mobile apps on pain and knee function in patients with OA. The review followed the Cochrane Handbook guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO. Inclusion criteria focused on RCTs involving adults aged 40 and above with knee OA, and outcomes were measured based on pain intensity and knee function. Results: Five RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The results varied: while some studies demonstrated minor improvements in pain and function with app-based interventions, others showed comparable effectiveness to traditional methods. The review highlights the potential of mobile apps to offer benefits in managing knee OA, though outcomes were inconsistent due to intervention and population heterogeneity. Conclusion: Despite the low certainty of evidence, mobile app-based interventions appear to have a positive impact on reducing pain and improving physical function in patients with knee OA. Continued research is essential to better understand the effectiveness and long-term impact of mobile technology in OA management, underscoring the value of digital health interventions in enhancing patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.