Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39711738›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Clinical concept annotation with contextual word embedding in active transfer learning environment.

Asim Abbas, Mark Lee, Niloofer Shanavas, Venelin Kovatchev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Asim AbbasSchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6374-0397
Mark LeeSchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Niloofer ShanavasSchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Venelin KovatchevSchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The study aims to present an active learning approach that automatically extracts clinical concepts from unstructured data and classifies them into explicit categories such as Problem, Treatment, and Test while preserving high precision and recall and demonstrating the approach through experiments using i2b2 public datasets. Methods: Initially labeled data are acquired from a lexical-based approach in sufficient amounts to perform an active learning process. A contextual word embedding similarity approach is adopted using BERT base variant models such as ClinicalBERT, DistilBERT, and SCIBERT to automatically classify the unlabeled clinical concept into explicit categories. Additionally, deep learning and large language model (LLM) are trained on acquiring label data through active learning. Results: Using i2b2 datasets (426 clinical notes), the lexical-based method achieved precision, recall, and F1-scores of 76%, 70%, and 73%. SCIBERT excelled in active transfer learning, yielding precision of 70.84%, recall of 77.40%, F1-score of 73.97%, and accuracy of 69.30%, surpassing counterpart models. Among deep learning models, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained with embeddings (BERTBase, DistilBERT, SCIBERT, ClinicalBERT) achieved training accuracies of 92-95% and testing accuracies of 89-93%. These results were higher compared to other deep learning models. Additionally, we individually evaluated these LLMs; among them, ClinicalBERT achieved the highest performance, with a training accuracy of 98.4% and a testing accuracy of 96%, outperforming the others. Conclusions: The proposed methodology enhances clinical concept extraction by integrating active learning and models like SCIBERT and CNN. It improves annotation efficiency while maintaining high accuracy, showcasing potential for clinical applications.

Indexed as

active transfer learningclinical concept annotationClinical concept extractioncontextual word embeddinginformation extractionlarge language models

Identifiers

PMID39711738
PMCPMC11660282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.