Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39711737›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Healthcare professionals' experiences of the change to telephone consultations in cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic: An explorative qualitative study.

Katrine Vammen Lindblad, Hanne Bødtcher, Dina Melanie Sørensen, Elizabeth Rosted, Eva Kjeldsted, Helle Gert Christensen, Mads Nordahl Svendsen, Linda Aagaard Thomsen, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katrine Vammen LindbladCancer Survivorship, Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hanne BødtcherCancer Survivorship, Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6615-3657
Dina Melanie SørensenDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde and Naestved, Denmark.
Elizabeth RostedDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde and Naestved, Denmark.
Eva KjeldstedCancer Survivorship, Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helle Gert ChristensenDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde and Naestved, Denmark.
Mads Nordahl SvendsenDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde and Naestved, Denmark.
Linda Aagaard ThomsenCancer Survivorship, Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Susanne Oksbjerg DaltonCancer Survivorship, Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: During the COVID-19 pandemic, changes were made in cancer care including increased use of teleconsultations (TCs) and restrictions for relatives to attend in-person appointments at the outpatient clinics. This study aimed to provide in-depth information on healthcare professionals' experiences of TC and the limited access for relatives during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted at an oncological department responsible for oncological care of all patients with cancer in one of five health regions in Denmark. Fourteen healthcare professionals participated in three semi-structured focus group interviews with either secretaries and nurses or physicians, and one semi-structured individual interview with a secretary. Data were analyzed by thematic analysis. Results: Four overall themes emerged in the thematic analysis: "Possibilities and limitations in relation to TC," "Information load and timing," "Insecurity" and "Lessons learned for the future." Healthcare professionals missed face-to-face interactions, feared to overlook patients' symptoms and relapse during TC, agreed that TC were not suitable for all types of consultations, and experienced improved work environment due to fewer patients and relatives at the department. Furthermore, patients should be involved in the decision of changing to TC, relatives must be recommended to participate in TC, physicians must meet the patient in-person before TC, and video consultations should be considered. Conclusion: TC may be a valuable supplement to in-person consultations for patients with cancer in the future, and guidelines must be implemented to ensure suitable consultation types for TC, include patients' preferences, and involve relatives.

Indexed as

cancer careCOVID-19healthcare professionalsqualitative studyteleconsultation

Identifiers

PMID39711737
PMCPMC11662310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.